Back to Writing
February 15, 20268 min readAIOpen SourceEngineering

OpenClaw Needed Enterprise-Grade Reliability. I Built It, Gave It Away, and OpenAI Inherited My Code.

Over 800 lines of crash-recovery infrastructure I built were merged into OpenClaw, now owned by OpenAI. This is the story of how it happened, and what it means.

I've always been early to technology shifts. Not because I'm clairvoyant, but because I pay attention to infrastructure before it becomes a product.

While most people were still debating whether “agentic AI” was real or hype, I was already building on it.

When OpenClaw was released, I immediately understood what it was: not just another AI tool, but a system designed to let AI agents operate in the real world. Sending messages, handling workflows, interacting across platforms like WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack. Infrastructure that allows AI to actually do things, not just generate text.

The Critical Flaw

But when I started running it in production conditions, I found a serious problem.

If the system crashed at the wrong moment (right after the AI created a response but before it delivered the message) that message would disappear completely. No retry, no warning. Just gone.

For a demo

That's inconvenient.

For a business

That's unacceptable.

Imagine a system handling customer communication, billing notifications, support escalations. Now imagine messages just silently vanishing on every restart. That's the gap between a cool prototype and something you can actually sell to a business.

Building the Fix from the Ground Up

So I built the fix myself.

I created a write-ahead queue that persists every outgoing message before it's sent. If the system crashes, it picks up where it left off on restart. Nothing gets lost, and everything is traceable.

800+

lines of infrastructure code were merged into the main project. Other developers had submitted similar fixes, but mine was the one that got selected and integrated.

GitHub Pull Request #15636

View the merged pull request

Shortly after, OpenClaw was acquired by OpenAI.

That means this reliability system now lives inside a framework shaping the future of agent-based AI under OpenAI's umbrella.

A Major Personal Milestone

This one matters to me. It's proof that I don't just understand AI conceptually. I understand what makes it work reliably in production. My design and code were reviewed, stress-tested, and accepted at a standard that most engineers never reach.

The Gauntlet

The review process was intense. An automated system flagged edge cases in error handling, recovery behavior, and API design. Every single one had to be addressed with working code and documented reasoning.

Then CI tests broke on Windows. I traced the issue through low-level process handling, tried a fix that actually made things worse, and ultimately resolved it through a completely different approach.

All review concerns addressed.
Full test suite passing.
Zero regressions.

Only after all of that did a core maintainer merge it to main.

The Community Response

The community response has been overwhelming:

“The write-ahead queue alone saved us from at least 3 crashes this week… community is shipping faster than most startups”

@clawdtalk

“Write-ahead queue is the quiet hero here, crash recovery used to be a pain”

@dashwizzle (Ryan Stefan)

“Threading and crash resilience are big structural upgrades”

@viet55241

Within 48 hours, developers across 4 different forks pulled my code into their production systems.

Frictionless Solutions

What This Means for Frictionless Solutions

The AI market is flooded with noise. Consultants who've never shipped a line of code. Startups running demos they can't scale. Agencies repackaging ChatGPT wrappers as “proprietary technology.”

There's one litmus test that cuts through all of it:

Show me your code in production.

Not a deck or a case study. Actual code, reviewed by world-class engineers and merged into a framework now owned by OpenAI. We cleared that bar.

Code Inside OpenAI

Our infrastructure code runs inside OpenAI's ecosystem. Not a claim. A verifiable commit history.

🔬

Peer-Reviewed & Merged

Survived rigorous code review, automated testing, and CI validation. The same bar as OpenAI's own engineers.

🏗️

Infrastructure Layer

We operate at the foundation, not the application layer. We build the tools other AI companies depend on.

🛡️

Zero Silent Failures

Enterprise-grade crash recovery. Every message tracked, every failure caught, every recovery automatic.

For Investors

This isn't theoretical capability. This is verified, production-grade engineering accepted into one of the most important AI infrastructure projects in the world. When you evaluate technical teams, this is the signal that cuts through the noise. We don't just use AI tools. We build the tools that other AI companies depend on.

For Joint Venture Partners

You need a technical partner who can operate at the infrastructure layer, not just the application layer. Our code runs inside OpenAI's ecosystem. That's not a marketing claim. It's a verifiable fact with a public commit history.

For Enterprise Clients

The same engineering rigor we applied to OpenClaw is what we bring to every client engagement. Systems that don't silently fail. Reliability that's been stress-tested. Code that passes the same review standards as OpenAI's own infrastructure.

In a sea of claims, this is a receipt.

Building enterprise AI infrastructure? Let's talk.

✍️Back to Writing